AI drawing review for commissioning agents
Verify design intent, cross-reference sequences of operation, and identify control points across all building systems.
What slows down commissioning agents
The recurring document problems that bleed into functional testing.
Verifying Design Intent
The Owner's Project Requirements must be traced through Basis of Design documents to actual drawing details, a tedious manual process.
Systems Coordination
Mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and controls systems must work together as designed, but drawing sets often contain conflicting information.
Sequence of Operations
Written sequences frequently do not match what is shown on control diagrams, mechanical schedules, and electrical power drawings.
How Helonic helps
From OPR to functional testing, Helonic supports every step of the commissioning workflow.
Design Intent Verification
Cross-reference OPR and BOD requirements against actual drawing details to confirm that design intent is accurately reflected in construction documents across all disciplines.
Sequence of Operations Cross-Reference
Compare written sequences of operation against mechanical drawings, control diagrams, and electrical schematics to flag inconsistencies before functional testing begins.
Control Point Identification
Automatically catalog all control points, sensors, actuators, and monitoring devices shown on drawings to build comprehensive pre-functional checklists and points lists.
Test and Balance Preparation
Extract airflow and water flow design values from mechanical schedules and drawings to prepare TAB requirements and verify consistency across the document set.
Systems Integration Review
Identify where building systems interact, BAS to fire alarm, lighting controls to HVAC, emergency power to life safety, and verify integration points are properly documented.
Common issues we catch
The coordination and controls gaps Helonic flags before functional testing starts.
Controls & Sequences
- Missing control points not shown on control diagrams
- Sequence of operations contradicting mechanical drawings
- Sensor placement errors affecting system performance
- Damper and valve positions inconsistent with sequences
Integration & Coordination
- Integration gaps between BAS, fire alarm, and lighting
- TAB design values inconsistent across schedules and plans
- Emergency power sequences not matching life safety requirements
- Metering and monitoring points missing from energy systems
ROI for commissioning agents
What commissioning teams typically see after adopting Helonic.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Helonic help commissioning start earlier?
What commissioning-relevant issues does it catch?
Does it replace functional performance testing?
Does it work on the design PDFs?
Manas Gandhi
Co-founder & CTO, HelonicManas is the co-founder and CTO of Helonic, where he leads engineering and AI research for construction drawing analysis. He works directly with structural, MEP, civil, and fire protection engineers to translate the way they review drawings into AI systems that flag the issues that actually matter in the field. Before Helonic, he built machine learning pipelines for technical document understanding and has spent the last several years interviewing licensed design engineers and discipline leads to ground product decisions in real practice rather than industry assumptions.
- AI for technical document understanding
- Cross-discipline coordination workflows
- Code compliance automation (IBC, NEC, NFPA, IPC, IMC, ASCE)
- Structural and MEP drawing review systems
How this page was researched: Guidance references ASHRAE commissioning process expectations and the design-phase review Cx agents perform. Examples are drawn from Helonic's review of MEP and controls documentation against commissioning requirements.
Last reviewed by Manas Gandhi · May 2026
Keep exploring
Related guides and adjacent solutions.