Helonic reads mechanical, electrical, and plumbing sheets together and flags conflicts that manual review misses, across MEP, structure, and architecture.
The coordination problems that bury MEP teams between issued sets.
Ductwork routing conflicts with structure and other systems.
Panel locations, conduit routing, and clearance requirements.
Pipe routing, slope requirements, and access clearances.
Where AI drawing review fits into MEP coordination across every discipline pairing.
Automatically check for conflicts between mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems on the same drawing set.
Identify where MEP routing conflicts with beams, columns, and structural elements.
Verify that ductwork, piping, and electrical fit within the available above-ceiling space.
Check that diffusers, lights, sprinklers, and other ceiling elements do not conflict.
Verify maintenance and service clearances around mechanical and electrical equipment.
The cross-system conflicts that show up in the field when no one cross-checks first.
Manas is the co-founder and CTO of Helonic, where he leads engineering and AI research for construction drawing analysis. He works directly with structural, MEP, civil, and fire protection engineers to translate the way they review drawings into AI systems that flag the issues that actually matter in the field. Before Helonic, he built machine learning pipelines for technical document understanding and has spent the last several years interviewing licensed design engineers and discipline leads to ground product decisions in real practice rather than industry assumptions.
How this page was researched: Coordination checks reference clearance and routing requirements from the IMC, IPC, NEC (NFPA 70), and NFPA 13, plus the cross-discipline coordination sequence MEP engineers follow. Clash examples are drawn from Helonic's review of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing sets coordinated against structural framing.
Last reviewed by Manas Gandhi · May 2026
Related guides and adjacent solutions.